However, if you were to benchmark other type of scenes, where the task is made complicated (f.e.

So, if you were to benchmark a scene with diffuse+spec and some texture, you'd likely find the GPU to be vastly more efficient on the way to convergence, most of the time. There is no single engine out there which can claim parity between CPU and GPU across the board (Although some do so in the big titles, all become tamer in the small prints.), and as such, comparisons become difficult in the best of cases, meaningless in *many* other.įurther to this, the two compute types favour some type of tasks over others. In the current state of affairs, a comparison isn't really possible. The goal could be to show three scene and per GPU/CPU and nearly the same final result should be reached.There will forever be disagreement on the meaning of 'Nearly'. The RTX 4090 goes on sale October 12, while both versions of the RTX 4080 will be available sometime in November.I would be curious to see a comparison too. It represents a massive increase in power over the previous generation of Nvidia GPUs, but you had better be prepared for big, bulky cases and massive power demands if you want to enjoy it.

The takeaway here is the 4090 is likely to be a beast of a graphics card.

This is the exact same as the RTX 3090 Ti, and we thought it was a lot when that card first rolled out back in March. The 4090 has a TGP of 450 watts and recommendations call for an 850W power supply at minimum. The other 40-series cards are around the same size, so regardless of which you choose, you may end up needing to upgrade.Īnother issue facing Nvidia’s mammoth 40-series GPUs is power consumption. That’s massive, and some of the third-party cards look even bigger. It’s a triple-slot unit that takes up to 336mm (13.2 inches) of space lengthwise, and it’s a whopping 61mm (2.4 inches) in height. Of course, the apparent performance bump certainly comes with a couple of downsides in size and power consumption.

Vray gpu benchmark results